Perspective

Thoughts of a Catholic convert

My Photo
Name:
Location: United States

Friday, November 16, 2007

The Seventh Sign


- Jürgen Prochnow as Jesus

The Gospel reading for today (Lk 17:26-37) is kind of apocalyptic ...

Jesus said to his disciples: “As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be in the days of the Son of Man; they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage up to the day that Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all. Similarly, as it was in the days of Lot: they were eating, drinking, buying, selling, planting, building; on the day when Lot left Sodom, fire and brimstone rained from the sky to destroy them all. So it will be on the day the Son of Man is revealed. On that day, someone who is on the housetop and whose belongings are in the house must not go down to get them, and likewise one in the field must not return to what was left behind. Remember the wife of Lot. Whoever seeks to preserve his life will lose it, but whoever loses it will save it. I tell you, on that night there will be two people in one bed; one will be taken, the other left. And there will be two women grinding meal together; one will be taken, the other left.” They said to him in reply, “Where, Lord?” He said to them, “Where the body is, there also the vultures will gather.”

... yikes! I don't really understand what's meant. Is "the day the Son of Man is revealed" the same end-time scenario as is written of in Revelation? There are many interpretations of the end-time, some fairly positive like the one in this article from America magazine - Apocalypse When? - and many much less so, like that in the Left Behind books. For the most part, I try not to think about it too much, but every once in a while a movie comes along and I find myself watching despite my better judgement.

One such movie is The Seventh Sign. I wish I could say it's a sequel to Bergman's The Seventh Seal but it's nowhere near as profound nor well done - it falls rather into the guilty pleasure category, the guilty part being its questionable theology, the pleasure part being twofold: Michael Biehn has a part in it :-) and even better, Jesus actually shows up, which is unusual in this kind of movie.

The movie, made in 1988 and starring Jürgen Prochnow of Das Boot fame as Jesus, Demi Moore, and Michael Biehn, tells the tale of the day of judgement, when Jesus returns to the earth with seven seals, breaking them one after the other, causing a number of natural disturbances. Jesus takes his time with the breaking of the seals, and while he's in LA, he rents a room over the garage of the home of Abby (Moore) and her husband (Biehn). As Abby gets acquainted with her strange lodger, she tries to figure out what the weird natural occurrences mean. A Catholic priest is also paying attention to the signs, and for good reason - he is actually a Roman Centurion who struck Jesus before the crucifixion, and who's been doomed to walk the earth undying until the second coming ..... a combination (according to wikipedia) of the legends of the Wandering Jew and of St. Longinus.

Here's a little of Roger Ebert's review of the movie ...

*****************************

"The Seventh Sign" begins with portents of the apocalypse. The rivers run with blood, the sea boils, the desert freezes, the birds fall from the sky, the earth shakes, and things are not so hot out on the beach in California, either. A strange man with burning eyes has just rented the little apartment over the garage in the backyard of Demi Moore's house, and she finds ancient Hebrew manuscripts in his desk - in a secret code .....

Moore has the central role, as a woman who has lost one child during pregnancy and is now fearful of losing another. The story begins in the last two months of her pregnancy, with her husband (Michael Biehn) lending moral support ..... She provides a strong center to the film, but the rest of it, alas, is all over the map. I am not even sure I completely understood all of the details. What connection was there, for example, between the Hebrew code letters with their wax seals and the dread events that followed every time one was opened? What were those flashbacks to Roman times? Who was that strange priest who traveled around the globe, checking out the frozen deserts and bloody rivers? And on whose side was the boarder over the garage? By the end of the movie, I was fairly certain of the answers to most of those questions, but the body of the film seemed almost deliberately confused and obscure, to no purpose. Why not explain the priest's actual mission, instead of saving it for a denouement at the last minute? Wouldn't that have been more interesting? And why is it that only the characters in the movie seem to be aware that things are going to hell and the apocalypse is at hand? .....

And then there is the problem of the ending of the movie ....

***************************

I can't tell you about the end of the movie - don't want to spoil it for anyone - and neither can I tell you about the end of the world ..... your best bet is to turn back to the Gospel reading above, and good luck with that :-)


12 Comments:

Blogger Cura Animarum said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

6:12 AM  
Blogger Cura Animarum said...

Next weekend is the Feast of Christ the King...that's why the readings are getting more and more Apocalyptic. The end of our Liturgical year is coming.

The thing about Apocalyptic literature is that it is always written during a time of great up-heaval, about a time of great up-heaval. That passage from Luke is a great example.

You have two perspectives (ideal passage for your blog! LOL!) You have Jesus talking to the disciples, knowing they will be n seeing him die soon...their world is about to come to a horrifying end.

You also have Luke writing to a community of believers who have just lived through the destruction of Jerusalem and the final destruction of the Jewish temple. Persecutions under Rome are growing more and more frequent and the Jewish authorities themselves are now kicking Christians out of the synagogues, stoning some, and rioting to run them out of town. From their perspective, the world is again coming crashing down around them. Nothing makes sense, why is one person stoned in the street while another runs free? Why one does one family disappear in the middle of the night wile their neighbors are untouched? (It's a mistake to see the 'being taken' aspect as a positive like the Left Behind books try to claim...in this context Luke doesn't talk about it as a good thing).

In a nut shell apocalyptic writing asks, "How do we live a faith based on hope, when things seem so hopeless?"

This is why it's been so easy, in every age, to see 'signs' of the end times. It is the constant challenge of faith to live as hope-filled people in times of senselessness, upheaval, and hopelessness. This section of the gospel ends on a pretty down note, but chapter 18 begins immediately with two parables of hope. All true apocalyptic literature ends with hope and for the Christian that Hope lies in the continuing presence of Christ who is "with you always, to the end of the age."

6:13 AM  
Blogger crystal said...

Cura,

Thanks, that helps to put the reading in perspective. I was thinking that the "takings" were supposed to be a good thing, like the rapture. I have trouble distinguishing between what to take literally and what to interpret.

12:04 PM  
Blogger Paul said...

We may be reaching a point where calculating the end of days can be more of a science than an art. The world just has to keep doing nothing about global warming.

Not fire, not ice, just hot air.

(Hey now, don't get personal . . .)

2:16 PM  
Blogger crystal said...

Hot air :-)

2:29 PM  
Blogger cowboyangel said...

One of the few poems I've ever memorized comes to mind: Robert Frost's, "Fire and Ice."

SOME say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,

I think I know enough of hate
To know that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

Unfortunately, I grew up in a household and spent my first few years as a Christian in an apocalyptic environment. Too many people thinking too much about the end of the world. It's terribly unhealthy, I finally decided.

I think Cura's spot on when he says: "It is the constant challenge of faith to live as hope-filled people in times of senselessness, upheaval, and hopelessness." I imagine people in every age think they're living in the End Times. And in our scared and fearful post 9/11 America, it's gotten even worse.

Jesus in LA? Now, that's a pretty scary thought. Personally, I think he'd come to New York, but that may be my personal bias. You know, see the city during Christmas and everything. It's really great this time of year.

8:50 AM  
Blogger cowboyangel said...

Actually, now that you mention it, you might be right about LA. I just remembered that penetrating spiritual tract by ZZ Top that does suggest our Lord could wind up in sunny Cal.

Jesus Just Left Chicago

Jesus just left Chicago and he's bound for New Orleans.
Well now, Jesus just left Chicago and he's bound for New Orleans.
Yeah, yeah.
Workin' from one end to the other and all points in between.

Took a jump through Mississippi, well, muddy water turned to wine.
Took a jump through Mississippi, muddy water turned to wine.
Yeah, yeah.
Then out to California, through the forests and the pines.
Ah, take me with you, Jesus.

You might not see him in person but he'll see you just the same.
You might not see him in person but he'll see you just the same.
Yeah, yeah.
You don't have to worry cause takin' care of business is his name.

8:52 AM  
Blogger crystal said...

Will,

Ha :-) that ZZ Top song sounds like the movie - he was going around the world, breaking a seal here and there (earthquake, river turned to blood, etc), and I think LA was his last stop.

I think that's waht bothers me about all the apocalyptic stuff - Jesus seeming to take part in so much destruction ... Revelation has "the lamb" breaking the seven seals.

11:57 AM  
Blogger Cura Animarum said...

That is a difficult thing for anyone to reconcile. I think the point for the author was to assure the people undergoing the persecutions under Diocletian that, in spite of how things may seem (that the powers of darkness have prevailed) it is God alone who is in charge of human history. The author ends the book (and then we our whole library of sacred scripture) on the high note of God finally restoring things to the way He's intended.

It becomes a testimony to the trust that we should rightly put in God.

I think the people of the day might have read things like this along the lines of "It's all in God's hands, and God will make it right....in spite of what the people in 'power' might think."

Still the images are difficult to swallow left on their own and most often we're only presented with them in isolation from the final consolation passages.

I remember watching The Seventh Sign when it first came out and I thought it was pretty cool at the time (Pretty sure I was still in High School then, end of the world stuff was running rampant then with all the cold war hype). I remember that guy who couldn't age and had to walk the earth until the last days. Couldn't remember why though. Now it won't keep picking at me ;o) !

12:49 PM  
Blogger crystal said...

He was a Roman soldier who had hit Jesus so had to live until the second coming. I saw the movie for the first time on tv.

Thanks for the background information on the readings. I really do often see the bad stuff in isolation from the context of the whole. Which reminds me of another apocalyptic movie .... maybe I'll post about that one too before the reading change :-)

1:41 PM  
Blogger nathan's shepherd said...

as apocalyptic films go my fav is Dr Strangelove.

5:10 PM  
Blogger crystal said...

Hi David - I've never seen that one all the way through .... maybe I'll rent it.

1:06 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home