The Odyssey
I'm not referring to the book by Homer, but the film by Christopher Nolan. I haven't seen it yet, of course ... it can only be properly viewed in IMAX and there are apparently only about 40 IMAX theaters in the whole world! There are a number of them here in California, though, so if I decide to go it won't be a problem.
But will I decide to go? Probably not. From what I've read about the movie so far, it has a lot of flaws.
My very first philosopjy class at college had us reading the Iliad and the Odyssey. The first book tells of the last year of the Trojan war, with the Greeks outside the walls of Troy, all supposedly to get back Helen, daughter of Zeus, the person who was so beautiful that her face had launched 1000 ships when she married Paris of Troy.
But anyway, the Odyssey starts at the end of the war, where Achilles had killed pretty much everyone, but the city still hadn't fallen. It is Odysseus, who finally brings down Troy, not by his bravery in battle, but by his stealth and guile in the creation and use of the Trojan Horse. He was, well, sneaky. And I think his questionable character was further revealed by the way it took him 10 years to then get back home to his wife and child, who really needed his help, because he was basically screwing around along the way.
But apparently, Nolan wants to somehow make Odysseus a real hero. A hero for the manosphere, a hero for the bros.
I would recommend instead a tv miniseries - Helen of Troy, 2003. I think you can find it on Youtube.
But, here's a bit from a review of Nolan's movie in TIME ...
The Odyssey Is Just Another Reason for Despair
[...] The Odyssey ends up being just another reason for despair. In the runup to its release, The Odyssey seems to have inspired more anxiety than actual anticipation. Lovers of classical literature have been asking, Will it hew close enough to Homer’s vision? Or, perhaps more accurately, Will it hew close enough to their vision of Homer’s vision? On the right, pundits have bemoaned what they see as the pure fact that you simply cannot have a Black Helen of Troy (she’s played in the film by Lupita Nyong’o), though it’s hard to fathom that the most controversial trait of a woman who’s been hatched from a swan’s egg should be the color of her skin. The Odyssey has already inspired so much chitter-chatter that its actual release was poised to be a letdown in comparison. But just wait till you actually see this eye-glazing dud of a movie.
Matt Damon, earnestly bewhiskered, stars as Odysseus, the King of Ithaca and a revered warrior, who’s working hard—or so it seems—to get home to his wife, Penelope (a reasonably dignified Anne Hathaway), and the grown son he has never gotten a chance to know, Telemachus (Tom Holland, so bland he’s practically unreadable). Odysseus has been gone for 20 years: The first 10 of those were eaten up by military exploits, chiefly the Trojan War—Nolan’s movie, like Homer’s tale, begins at the end of that war, with a giant wooden horse half-sunk in the sand, a pretty direct reference to the beached and forlorn Statue of Liberty at the end of Planet of the Apes. Throughout The Odyssey, we’ll get flashback glimpses of just how violent the sack of Troy, led by Odysseus, was. The suggestion is that he has done some Really Bad Stuff, though the battle scenes, while elaborate, are so tastefully un-bloody that it’s hard to feel there’s anything at stake ...












